Therefore,
conceptually speaking, formal education is based on a theoretical curriculum,
whose final product is the acquisition of qualifications and certificates, which
is perhaps the reason why the system has become flawed in itself: students end
up worrying and focusing more about grades than learning.
Nonetheless, fortunately I got the chance to know the power of non-formal education through Erasmus+ mobility projects and European Solidarity Corps (ESC) programs. They are developed and financed by the European Commission, and even though they are different – while the former provides youth exchanges, training courses, etc, where young people gather in a place and share knowledge on a specific topic, the latter focuses on short and long-term volunteering projects under a specific association – both have in common its basis, which is to show that it is possible to acquire knowledge and improve skills in a different context than that of the normal school pattern.
Thus,
non-formal education refers to programmes and processes designed to improve a
range of skills and competences, outside the formal educational curriculum (for
instance, youth organisations). The emphasis is on learning, instead of
teaching, through a variety of resources and technologies, which explains the
existence of facilitators (and not teachers), who give the tools, so that the
learner can understand by him/herself the importance of acquiring new knowledge
(sometimes even about subjects that are not our field of study) and improving
skills.
In
summary, it is worth mentioning that the purpose is not to replace one by the
other, but to integrate non-formal education in a better way. They are
complementary and “mutually reinforcing elements of a lifelong learning process”.
It’s mandatory to have this non-formal element because it’s the way to acquire
skills useful for their social inclusion, personal growth and democratic
engagement.
Inês Martins